people:demitri_maestas:project
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
people:demitri_maestas:project [2017/09/13 00:51] – created chucho2 | people:demitri_maestas:project [2017/09/13 04:33] (current) – chucho2 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | test | + | ====== Blue Sky Idea(s) ====== |
+ | [[people: | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== An Artificial Neuron ==== | ||
+ | Evolution has done so much of the dirty work for us; 3.5 billion years of attempts at creating robust living systems {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Robustness in Machine Learing ==== | ||
+ | We've all seen what machine learning is capable of and the things it can help us do. Just take a look at this awesome machine learning example that Youtuber " | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Machine Learning is an exciting field in computer science, but what is the robust first approach to machine learning? How can we use the same principals in the MFM to accomplish the same results? Is it even possible to accomplish machine learning, or do we need to think of a new form of computation for robust results? | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Common Algorithms as a Process ==== | ||
+ | Machine learning is great at patterns. The Machine Learning algorithms we use today can become the best players in{{ : | ||
+ | But what about the Min-Max paradigm that is implemented to solve tic-tac-toe? | ||
+ | |||
+ | The one that can keep up with any decent human player, because it becomes more intelligent with the more resources it is allotted? | ||
+ | |||
+ | What is our robust equivalent? | ||
+ | |||
+ | **How would the MFM //play// tic-tac-toe with a human opponent? | ||
+ | |||
+ | We need to start thinking with portals.... | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | --- // | ||
+ | |||
+ | Pictures Used: | ||
+ | |||
+ | https:// | ||
+ | http:// |
people/demitri_maestas/project.1505263900.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/09/13 00:51 by chucho2