papers:ezra_stallings
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
papers:ezra_stallings [2014/10/27 20:29] – [Abstract] vyross | papers:ezra_stallings [2014/12/01 21:45] (current) – vyross | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== | + | ====== |
- | + | {{: | |
- | + | {{: | |
- | ===== Abstract ===== | + | |
- | + | ||
- | In the Movable Feast Machine (MFM), a simulated infinite computer, we have to contend with a highly limited scope of spatially oriented memory and random asynchronous execution, which complicates search algorithms and data structures. We took on the problem of finding other elements in a sparsely populated environment using an active sensing system. In our simulation, we have a number of nodes which have to find and link to each other. Each node can send out tentacle-like feelers, which act like spatially linked lists, and can be activated when they encounter another node to form a semi-permanent socket connection. We found that the wandering linked lists, when working as a self-optimizing, | + | |
- | ===== Conclusion ===== | + | |
- | + | ||
- | This method for pathfinding works well for sparse structures, demonstrating both an ability for the concept to work with a clear goal in the context of a more complex system (the conflict) and an ideal density level for the system to allow pathfinding to work well. If the machine is too sparsely populated, it can take scouts far too long to find their adversaries, | + |
papers/ezra_stallings.1414441793.txt.gz · Last modified: 2014/10/27 20:29 by vyross