Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision |
| dev:quiz_ulam [2015/06/28 17:48] – xychen | dev:quiz_ulam [2015/06/28 17:52] (current) – xychen |
|---|
| The end-positions of the experiments didn't show obvious bias. That's fair because of the initial layout of our experiments. When ''Boxes'' are evenly placed in grid pattern, they //attract// the ''Pairs'' evenly, which will produce no bias. When ''Boxes'' are placed in a line, they are too sparse to //trap// ''Pairs''. This did not produce bias either. In the following experiment, we will place a bunch of ''Boxes'' in the 1st quadrant. This cluster of ''Boxes'' will //attract// the first ''Pair'' and produce more ''Pairs''. Then, the end-positions will show obvious favor to the 1st quadrant. | The end-positions of the experiments didn't show obvious bias. That's fair because of the initial layout of our experiments. When ''Boxes'' are evenly placed in grid pattern, they //attract// the ''Pairs'' evenly, which will produce no bias. When ''Boxes'' are placed in a line, they are too sparse to //trap// ''Pairs''. This did not produce bias either. In the following experiment, we will place a bunch of ''Boxes'' in the 1st quadrant. This cluster of ''Boxes'' will //attract// the first ''Pair'' and produce more ''Pairs''. Then, the end-positions will show obvious favor to the 1st quadrant. |
| |
| If the end-positions of ''Pairs'' are not surprising, how about the ''Boxes''? Did they still remain in line or in grid? How are they messed up by the ''Pair''? | {{:dev:4overlay_500.png?350|}} |
| | |
| | The above graph is what we saw if we put the three pictures together. If the end-positions of ''Pairs'' are not surprising, how about the ''Boxes''? Did they still remain in line or in grid? How they were messed up by the ''Pair''? |
| |
| | |
